<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>Search</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.baseone.co.uk/blog/search/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.baseone.co.uk/blog/search/atom.xml" />
    <id>tag:www.baseone.co.uk,2009-09-25:/blog/search//2</id>
    <updated>2010-05-27T13:00:13Z</updated>
    
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.3-en</generator>

<entry>
    <title>&apos;Personalised Search&apos; and the New Search Metric</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.baseone.co.uk/blog/search/2010/05/personalised-search-metric.html" />
    <id>tag:www.baseone.co.uk,2010:/blog/search//2.305</id>

    <published>2010-05-27T11:42:38Z</published>
    <updated>2010-05-27T13:00:13Z</updated>

    <summary>A couple of weeks ago I found the ranking positions of a website I&apos;m working on drastically fluctuating from position 1 to 4. I was intrigued with how ranking positions were fluctuating that much on Google in a very short...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Joseph Volcy</name>
        <uri>http://www.baseonegroup.co.uk/beyond/joseph-volcy.html</uri>
    </author>
    <category term="rankingreport" label="Ranking Report" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="searchmetric" label="Search Metric" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.baseone.co.uk/blog/search/">
        <![CDATA[<div style="text-align: left;">A couple of weeks ago I found the ranking
positions of a website I'm working on drastically fluctuating from position 1
to 4. I was intrigued with how ranking positions were fluctuating that much on
Google in a very short space of time.</div><div style="text-align: left;"><br /></div><img alt="personalised_search.jpg" src="http://www.baseone.co.uk/blog/search/personalised_search.jpg" width="425" height="404" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">I quickly found out that Google recently
released a very exciting new feature in <b>Webmaster Tool&nbsp;</b>that enables us to see
the <b>number of impressions </b>and<b> clicks </b>for our most<b> </b>popular keywords, together
with the <b>rankings of keywords</b> for a defined period. This was interesting,
since it was now possible to analyse how the number of impressions and clicks
differed based on the different positions of a website in Google search
results. In fact, this new Webmaster Tool feature is quite close to the
<b>Click-Through-Rate</b> data provided in Google Adwords.</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;"><img alt="Google_Personalised_Search_Webmaster_tool.jpg" src="http://www.baseone.co.uk/blog/search/Google_Personalised_Search_Webmaster_tool.jpg" width="500" height="56" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;"><i></i></p><i><div style="text-align: center;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: normal; "><i><p class="MsoNormal" style="display: inline !important; "><span lang="EN-GB"><b>Ranking Report in Google Webmaster Tool</b></span></p></i></span></div></i><p></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;"><i></i></p><i><p class="MsoNormal" style="display: inline !important; "><span lang="EN-GB"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: normal; ">I was delighted to find such detailed and
useful information. However, I quickly realised that what Google might be
indirectly telling us is quite exceptional and could drastically change the way
the 'search industry' reports on results.</span></span></p></i><p></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;"><i></i></p><i><p class="MsoNormal" style="display: inline !important; "><span lang="EN-GB"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: normal; ">The most interesting thing I discovered is
the fact that Google is now showing data on rankings <b>across a range of results</b>:
detailed information from position 1 to position 5, and combined data for position
6-10 and then combined data for the 2nd page and 3rd page on the Search Engine
Results (SERPs). With the recent advent of <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/12/personalized-search-for-everyone.html"><b>Google Personalised Search</b></a>, rankings are no
longer the same for every visitor and never before had there been a good way of
tracking the impact of this.</span></span></p></i><p></p><div>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><o:p>Personalised search is, in reality,
customised search results for users based on their previous search activity. <span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp;</span>This being possible by an anonymous cookie in
their browsers and which Google says is completely separated from Google
Accounts. But with this new Google webmaster tool feature, <b>we are now capable
of analysing the rankings of websites on both personalised results and general
organic results.</b></o:p></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">What Google is trying to make us understand
here is that a website will no longer have a particular ranking for a specific
keyword, but will have <b>a range of rankings determined by various
personalisation factors. </b></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">So, I believe search experts will now have
to analyse, optimise and report on website rankings differently. Whilst in the
past an agency or in-house Search Specialist might have reported on exact website
rankings based on targeted keywords, reports would make more sense if they now
provide the complete range of ranking positions that a website has for a
keyword together with its related traffic.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp;
</span>Below is an example on how a section of a search report might look:</span></p><p></p><b><i><b><i><p class="MsoNormal" style="display: inline !important; "><span lang="EN-GB"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: normal; "><br /><img alt="Organic-Search-Ranking-Report-Example.jpg" src="http://www.baseone.co.uk/blog/search/Organic-Search-Ranking-Report-Example.jpg" width="499" height="164" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></span></span></p></i></b></i></b></div><div><b><i><b><i><p class="MsoNormal" style="display: inline !important; "><span lang="EN-GB"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: normal; "></span></span></p><div style="text-align: center;">Organic Search Ranking Report</div><div style="text-align: center;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: normal;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: normal;"><br /></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: normal;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: normal;">Furthermore, goals in SEO campaigns will most probably change from delivering a particular ranking to giving a site </span>a higher probability of ranking in a certain range of positions.<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: normal;"> For example: increasing the probability that a site will rank in the top 3 positions from 15% to 60%, rather than looking and reporting on a website's ranking at a given day and time. &nbsp;A report showing that a website was in the top 3 rankings 60% of the time for a particular month will be a lot more valuable than just saying that a website ranked 1st at the last ranking report.</span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: normal;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: normal;"><br /></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: normal;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: normal;">It will also not be a surprise to find results being bounced around every week, every day or even every hour (depending on the specific time of day, for instance).</span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: normal;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: normal;">It is most probable that the new rule would be 'ranking' being just a probability rather than an exact number.</span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: normal;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: normal;"><br /></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: normal;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: normal;">It seems that more than ever Google is telling us to stop worrying about exact rankings and to focus on targeted traffic generated by a range of ranking positions. Because in the end it's all about targeted traffic and conversions.</span></span></div><div><br /></div><p></p></i></b></i></b></div>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Is your website fast enough for Google?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.baseone.co.uk/blog/search/2010/03/is-your-website-fast-enough-for-google.html" />
    <id>tag:www.baseonegroup.co.uk,2010:/blog/search//2.281</id>

    <published>2010-03-12T10:21:33Z</published>
    <updated>2010-03-12T10:43:32Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[Google recently came up with its netbook-centric operating system 'Chromium' but at the same time released its source 'openly' to the public. &nbsp;Therefore it is available to anyone to download free and furthermore allowing developers to play around and tweak...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Joseph Volcy</name>
        <uri>http://www.baseonegroup.co.uk/beyond/joseph-volcy.html</uri>
    </author>
    <category term="optimisation" label="optimisation" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="organic" label="organic" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.baseone.co.uk/blog/search/">
        <![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"></span></p><p class="MsoNormal">Google recently came up with its netbook-centric operating system '<a href="http://www.chromium.org/chromium-os">Chromium</a>' but at the same time released its source 'openly' to the public. &nbsp;Therefore it is available to anyone to download free and furthermore allowing developers to play around and tweak the system as they like. &nbsp;</p><p class="MsoNormal">I cannot stop thinking that we are going back to the times where the mainframe was actually the computer. &nbsp;Much like Sun's old assumption that the network is the computer. With the release of Chromium, Google is putting more emphasis on the initiative that browser-based applications are the future and is coming up with their first true cloud-based operating system.&nbsp;</p><p class="MsoNormal">Several tests have already been performed by leaders in the information technology industry and results were interesting. &nbsp;One of the main results was that Chromium is a very fast operating system. &nbsp;At a recent press conference Google claimed that Chrome OS had a boot-time of 7 seconds and this isn't an exaggeration at all. &nbsp;</p><p class="MsoNormal">Performance of applications running on Chromium browser essentially comes down to the speed of the Chromium browser. That makes us realise that the new rule of thumb for Google could be '<b>speed</b>'. &nbsp;</p><p></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><img alt="Google-Speedometer.png" src="http://www.baseonegroup.co.uk/blog/search/Google-Speedometer.png" width="412" height="316" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Google certainly have the power to simulate
and estimate the amount of time it takes to connect to a page, the way and
amount of time a page renders in a browser, and how people react to those times
to influence how a page is ranked, classified, and how much of the page is
crawled and indexed.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>This will also include
embedded material on a page such as javascript or flash content.</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><o:p>Therefore pages that are loaded quicker
have a better chance to get crawled frequently, indexed and have a better
search visibility compared to pages that are loaded more slowly.</o:p></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><o:p>Below is a short list of page-loading tips
that I thought might be helpful:</o:p></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"></p><ul><li>Avoid overloading a website with images since
large files take longer to load.</li></ul><div><br /></div><ul><li>Javascript has some advantages over
Flash.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>Flash is overdone and takes
longer to load and sometimes makes websites over-complicated.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>However, it is recommended to place
Javascript files in an external file.</li></ul><div><br /></div><ul><li>In case videos are hosted on the website, it
is better to host the videos on YouTube and provide a link from your website
than hosting it directly on the website.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp;
</span>YouTube is so big that it has the ability to load videos quickly.</li></ul><div><br /></div><ul><li>Avoid "Enter Site" introduction pages, they
have a high load-in-time and are so 'old-school'. It's better to let visitors go
straight to the information.</li></ul><div><br /></div><ul><li>Keep the mark-up simple.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>Most HTML tags can be styled via an external
CSS so there is no need for them to be placed in a nested table for example.</li></ul><div><br /></div><ul><li>It is recommended to use XHTML and CSS to start
out a website, using tables for layout is not recommended since they can cause
a big mess in the mark-up language and finally slows down the loading times.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>Storing CSS information in an external file
keeps your website neat and ensures a fast page-load time.</li></ul><div><br /></div><ul><li>Server side compression software are also
very useful, they ensure files are at their optimum size prior to being sent to
the client browser, this works particularly well for script (e.g. PHP) and CSS
files where the focus is not on semantics.</li></ul><div><br /></div><ul><li>Images must be optimised at the correct
seize/weight.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>This is important because
large image files will take a much longer time to load than a lighter image
that has already been processed by an image editing software.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>However this may implies some compromises on
the picture quality.</li></ul><div><br /></div><ul><li>Images should ideally be used only for
headers or logos and never for large bodies of text.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>Static text takes only a few bytes as
compared to images that consume thousands of bytes.</li></ul><p></p>

















<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">The new Google race is now opened, is your website fast enough?</span></p> ]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Thierry&apos;s Trial by Tweet</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.baseone.co.uk/blog/search/2009/11/thierrys-trial-by-tweet.html" />
    <id>tag:www.baseonegroup.co.uk,2009:/blog/search//2.242</id>

    <published>2009-11-30T11:17:29Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-30T11:37:45Z</updated>

    <summary>&quot;The reactionaries are in possession of force, in not only the army and police, but in the press and the schools&quot; John Dewey (American Philosopher, Psychologist and Educator, 1859-1952)I&apos;ve been with Base One for a few weeks now and was...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mark Barrett</name>
        
    </author>
    <category term="socialmedia" label="Social Media" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.baseone.co.uk/blog/search/">
        <![CDATA[<img alt="Thierry-Henry235.png" src="http://www.baseonegroup.co.uk/blog/search/Thierry-Henry235.png" class="mt-image-right" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 20px 20px; float: right;" height="235" width="235" /><i>"The reactionaries are in possession of force, in not only the army and police, </i><i>but in the press </i><i>and the schools" John Dewey (American Philosopher, Psychologist and Educator, 1859-1952)</i><br /><br />I've been with <b>Base One</b> for a few weeks now and was told that my settling in period had come to an end, the kid gloves were off and I was "asked" to produce my first post for the company. <br /><br />I was racking my brains about what to post about when, over 200 miles from my home an incident occurred. A single action; followed by a difficult decision, leading to an outcome that has seen a man's reputation destroyed and talk of economic consequences to the countries involved.<br /><br />I speak of <b>Thierry Henry</b> and what is now being dubbed "La main de Dieu" (Hand of God). For those that don't know what happened, France progressed to the World Cup at the expense of the Republic of Ireland. The decisive goal, scored by <b>William Gallas</b> was set up by <b>Thierry Henry</b> who handled the ball before crossing to his team mate.<br /><br />Now I won't be discussing the incident itself, instead I am looking at the part played by Social Media in the syndication and resulting emotional outpouring from large numbers of individuals across the globe.<br /><br />The power of the press is Waning, yielding to the Power of the People. Nowadays anyone with a link to the Internet and an opinion can affect the views of the masses, and generally steal a march on the larger press by publishing instantly. This news is swiftly syndicated through the various bookmarking and newswire websites and then <b>Social Networking</b> is utilised to provide a platform to discuss, debate and in some cases "vent;" like a child wielding his dads' rifle.<br /><br />It was through this medium that I watched <b>Thierry Henry's</b> fall from grace. People from different countries and different walks of life fuelled a relentless wave of different opinions and different emotions, the overwhelming emotion being anger.<br /><br />Taking <b>Twitter</b> as my first example, within minutes of the incident, whilst the match was still playing in fact, the torrent had begun. By the full-time whistle Tweets appeared to be coming in at around 195 every 30 seconds. Within the hour after the final whistle "<b>Thierry Henry</b>" and "<b>Henry</b>" had become trending topics. At 10am, on the 20th of November (Over 36 Hours after the event) the tweets continue although flow has calmed to a handful a minute.<br /><br />Where <b>Twitter</b> quickly built to a deafening crescendo and dissipated in much the same way, <b>Facebook</b> built quickly and seemed to maintain some momentum. Immediately after the incident my "<b>Live News</b>" was full of related comments which continued into the night and the following morning,<br /><br />I also came across the <b>Facebook</b> Page - "<b>We Irish hate Thierry Henry (The Cheat)</b>" which was created after the match. By Midday on 19th November, the page had 30,000 fans then by 10am on 20th November the number of fans had swelled to over 80,000 and was then removed <b>Facebook</b> due to the nature of the group and the offensive nature of the comments being posted. <br /><br /><b>YouTube</b> was also pounced upon with multiple videos posted, commanding views numbering in the tens of thousands. Replaying, berating, and making fun of <b>Thierry Henry</b> including a depiction of <b>Adolf Hitler's</b> reaction to the goal.<br /><br />A man made a choice; that choice was instantly scrutinized worldwide, and brought to the attention of millions by angered voices without hesitation, or thought to the possible fallout. This led to threats of violence, unchecked widespread racism and other ugly human traits in true "<b>Angry Mob</b>" style.<br /><br />The beauty of <b>Social Media</b> is that it provides total freedom of expression, but that total freedom can also show its dark side; when it is used to personally attack someone or something.<br /><br /><b>Social Media can be an extremely effective weapon, with the power to change lives.<br /><br />Is it too easy to wield?<br /><br />Is there anything we can do about it? <br /><br />If there is, do we want to? </b><div><br /></div>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Americans Say No to Customised Adds via Online Tracking</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.baseone.co.uk/blog/search/2009/10/americans-say-no-to-customised-adds-via-online-tracking.html" />
    <id>tag:www.baseonegroup.co.uk,2009:/blog/search//2.230</id>

    <published>2009-10-26T14:34:36Z</published>
    <updated>2009-10-26T14:38:13Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[A quick post regarding news from my native land -&nbsp;the majority of Americans do not like advertisements, discounts, and news tailored to their interests via online tracking, reports NY Times.&nbsp;&nbsp;The poll, backed by professors at UPenn and UC Berkley, is...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Chelsea Blacker</name>
        <uri>http://www.baseonegroup.co.uk/beyond/chelsea-blacker.html</uri>
    </author>
    <category term="onlineadvertising" label="online advertising" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="webtracking" label="web tracking" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.baseone.co.uk/blog/search/">
        <![CDATA[<span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102); font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10px; ">A quick post regarding news from my native land -&nbsp;<b>the majority of Americans do not like advertisements, discounts, and news tailored to their interests via online tracking</b>, reports <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/30/business/media/30adco.html?_r=1&amp;scp=1&amp;sq=tailored+ads&amp;st=nyt">NY Times</a>.&nbsp;&nbsp;The poll, backed by professors at UPenn and UC Berkley, is "the first independent, nationally representative telephone survey on behavioural advertising."</span> <div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#666666" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 10px;"><br /></span></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#666666" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 10px;"><img alt="nytimes_pic2.jpg" src="http://www.baseonegroup.co.uk/blog/search/nytimes_pic2.jpg" width="375" height="224" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></span></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#666666" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 10px; "><br /></span></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#666666" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 10px;">I wonder if it's this simple - that Americans dislike targeted media, or if the fear of privacy invasion what preoccupies their minds?&nbsp; Either way, targeted advertising via tracking isn't going away so they better get used to it.&nbsp; Looks like the youth are slightly more open minded to it.&nbsp;<br /><br />I can't imagine not wanting things tailored to my interests. I'm not as bored when exposed to advertising, I dare suggest I'm even, on occasion, informed!&nbsp; Except for that spotify advertisement about killing motorcyclists while I drive (complete with splat noise), b/c I don't even have a license.<br /><br /><b>What do you think?&nbsp;</b>Are these Americans simply naivete to the benefits of target marketing which results from online tracking? Are they justified to be flipping out about privacy concerns - that marketers are "spying" on them when they visit the marketer's sites?&nbsp; Let me know!&nbsp;<br /><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, serif; font-size: 15px; line-height: 22px; text-align: left; "></span></span></span></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#666666" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 10px;"><br /></span></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#666666" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 10px;"><br /></span></font></div>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>AdWords Ad Scheduling + Google Analytics Custom Reporting = Better Target Your B2B Audience!</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.baseone.co.uk/blog/search/2009/10/adwords-ad-scheduling-google-a.html" />
    <id>tag:www.baseonegroup.co.uk,2009:/blog/search//2.201</id>

    <published>2009-10-02T14:36:56Z</published>
    <updated>2009-10-02T15:23:02Z</updated>

    <summary>Google AdWords ad scheduling setting lets you specify certain hours or days of the week when you want your PPC ads to appear. Ad scheduling can give your PPC campaign a better &apos;bang for the buck&apos; by improving your ROI...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mathias Ahlgren</name>
        
    </author>
    <category term="adwords" label="adwords" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="analytics" label="analytics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="customreporting" label="custom reporting" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="googleadwords" label="google adwords" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="googleadwordsadscheduling" label="google adwords ad scheduling" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="googleanalytics" label="google analytics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="googleanalyticscustomreporting" label="google analytics custom reporting" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="payperclick" label="pay per click" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="ppc" label="ppc" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.baseone.co.uk/blog/search/">
        <![CDATA[<b>Google AdWords ad scheduling</b> setting lets you specify certain hours or days of the week when you want your <b>PPC </b>ads to appear. Ad scheduling can give your <b>PPC campaign</b> a better 'bang for the buck' by improving your ROI by making sure that your ads only run when it makes the most sense for your business.<br /><br />If you are from a B2B context you might schedule your ads to run only on business hours - let's assume only weekdays say from 8:00 am to 6:00 pm. targeting business hours when you think your audience is looking for your products/services. Setting up the ad scheduling is easy as ABC - or B2B! Simply log in to your <b>AdWords account</b>, go to the <b>settings tab</b>, then <b>advanced settings</b> and there you find the <b>ad scheduling settings</b>.<br /><br />But how can you be certain your scheduled ads actually target your audience effectively, that you are spending your cost per click on your desired audience? This is very your <b>Google Analytics</b> account come into play. <b>Google Analytics Custom Reporting</b> can help you take out the guesswork in ad scheduling when your audience is looking for your products/services. Let your website visitors, who are your audience determine when to target your <b>PPC</b> audience. <br /><br />By setting up a <b>custom report</b> you can find out how visitors are behaving on your website at what hours of the day, at what days, pages per visit and bounce rate. With this information you can adjust the <b>PPC ad scheduling</b> and budget accordingly.<br /><br />To <b>set up custom reporting</b> simply login to your <b>Analytics account</b>, click on custom reporting in the left menu and in the top right corner click on "<b>create a new custom report</b>". Nothing needs to be installed or verified.<br /><br /><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img class="mt-image-none" alt="customereporting100.jpg" src="http://www.baseonesearch.co.uk/blog/customereporting100.jpg" height="240" width="319" /></span><br /><br />In the left menu called '<b>Metrics</b>' click on '<b>Site Usage</b>' and drag-and-drop '<b>Entrances</b>' (along with good traffic quality indicators '<b>Time on Site</b>', '<b>Pages per Visit</b>', and '<b>Bounce Rate</b>') one by one across to the '<b>Metric</b>' boxes. Then do the same thing with '<b>Dimensions</b>', click on '<b>Visitors</b>' and drag-and-drop '<b>Day</b>' over to the '<b>Dimension</b>' box and '<b>Hour of the Day</b>' over to the '<b>Sub-Dimension</b>' box.<br /><br /><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img class="mt-image-none" alt="customereporting200.jpg" src="http://www.baseonesearch.co.uk/blog/customereporting200.jpg" height="240" width="299" /></span><br /><br />Then <b>rename your custom report</b> to whatever you want to call it by editing the title. Click the '<b>Preview</b>' button to see your custom report and if you are happy with the report then finally click on '<b>Create Report</b>'. Now you have created your custom report!<br /><br />With these metrics in your custom report you can now in more detail find out how visitors behave on your website, during what hours of the day and at what days. Based on the information you get from the report you might want to refine the PPC ad scheduling.<br /><br /><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img class="mt-image-none" alt="customereporting301.jpg" src="http://www.baseonesearch.co.uk/blog/customereporting301.jpg" height="153" width="319" /></span><br /><br />In the example above the majority of entrances to the website happened in late afternoons between 2:00 pm and 5:00 pm and the majority of entrances happened on Mondays and Fridays. From this example scheduling the PPC ads to run only on 8:00 am to 6:00 pm on only weekdays would be advisable.<br /><br />Set aside a couple of hours to learn <b>Google Analytics custom reporting</b>. Apart from creating a custom report in Google Analytics to refine <b>PPC </b>spend and strategy you can create a custom report to help you optimise your online <b>leads </b>and <b>conversions</b>. More about that in another blog post.]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Why Microsoft&apos;s Windows 7 Launch is a Marketing FAIL</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.baseone.co.uk/blog/search/2009/09/why-microsofts-windows7-launch.html" />
    <id>tag:www.baseonegroup.co.uk,2009:/blog/search//2.202</id>

    <published>2009-09-25T10:37:36Z</published>
    <updated>2009-10-01T09:37:39Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[Microsoft's Windows 7 home operating system comes out on 22 October 2009, less than three years after the launch of Vista.&nbsp; In order to get people "buzzed" about their new product, they are encouraging Windows 7 House Parties!&nbsp; Doesn't that...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Chelsea Blacker</name>
        <uri>http://www.baseonegroup.co.uk/beyond/chelsea-blacker.html</uri>
    </author>
    <category term="houseparty" label="house party" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="windows7" label="windows 7" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="windows7houseparty" label="windows 7 house party" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.baseone.co.uk/blog/search/">
        <![CDATA[Microsoft's Windows 7 home operating system comes out on 22 October 2009, less than three years after the launch of Vista.&nbsp; In order to get people "buzzed" about their new product, they are encouraging <b>Windows 7 House Parties</b>!&nbsp; <br /><br />Doesn't that sound like fun!?&nbsp; Naturally, I want to use my Saturday preparing to encourage my neighbors to use an overpriced Microsoft product (I vote <a href="http://www.linux.org/info/">Linux</a>).&nbsp; Don't forget - Microsoft wants pictures!<br /><br />I was <b>laughing really hard this morning</b>, as I learned how to host my Windows 7 party (yes, they are serious):<br /><br /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/1cX4t5-YpHQ&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=0x234900&amp;color2=0x4e9e00" width="480" height="295" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always"><br /><br /><b>What's the incentive?&nbsp;</b> Why would <i>anyone </i>do this? The answer: <b>a party pack </b>which includes...<br /><br />* One limited Signature Edition Windows 7® Ultimate (32 bit)<br />* One Deck of Playing Cards with Windows 7® Desktop Design<br />* One Puzzle with Windows 7® Desktop Design<br />* One Poster with Windows 7® Desktop Design<br />* Ten Tote Bags with Windows 7® Desktop Design for hosts and guests<br />* One table top centerpiece for decoration<br />* One package of Windows 7® napkins<br /><br />I didn't even add in those little R's!&nbsp; They came straight from the responder at <a href="http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090913195122AAt2Uvt">Yahoo Answers!</a><br /><br />Excuse me???&nbsp; You want me to host a party in exchange for Windows themed napkins?&nbsp; And playing cards!?&nbsp; There are no streamers or balloons involved because those extras are only shipped in America.&nbsp; For a keg and some meat to put on the BBQ I may be tempted.<br /><br />So<b> <a href="http://www.houseparty.com/windows7">I've applied to be a host</a>.</b> I'm not sure why, because I don't need ten Windows 7 tote bags and I have a Mac at home. Maybe my roommate could use the "Signature Edition Windows 7® Ultimate" for work. <br /><br />Two parts of the application process made me chuckle - and it <b>made the whole experience so PC-ish</b>. First, I had to go on a duck hunt running tests and confirming my PC here in the office is capable of running Windows 7. Okay, fine, no, I didn't actually do this, but I <i>could </i>have... <br /><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="DISPLAY: inline"><img class="mt-image-center" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0pt auto 20px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" height="190" alt="windows7_houseparty_application.jpg" src="http://www.baseonesearch.co.uk/blog/windows7_houseparty_application.jpg" width="488" /></span> Secondly, I had to decide whether or not I wanted to receive emails about Microsoft products.&nbsp; Oh wait - did I say "decide"?&nbsp; Microsoft actually made the choice for me, kind of like when my Windows XP decides to restart at 11am to do some random updates I will never need. <br /><br /><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="DISPLAY: inline"><img class="mt-image-center" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0pt auto 20px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" height="86" alt="windows7_houseparty_application2.jpg" src="http://www.baseonesearch.co.uk/blog/windows7_houseparty_application2.jpg" width="526" /></span><br /><br />And the "legal jargon" section - was <b>FOUR PAGES LONG</b> - single spaced size 12 font!&nbsp; I feel bad about the internet trees, so I wont publish the whole thing but it's over 1,500 words. &nbsp;&nbsp; <br />
<div><br /></div>
<div>In short, dear Microsoft, you're not providing the right types of incentive - and that video of 4 "friends" isn't helping your cause.&nbsp; The last time I saw those 4 different types of people together one was clutching her purse tightly.<br /><br />This whole house party campaign is a sin against marketing. Essentially Microsoft is asking random people to market to their friends for them, and they don't have that type of pull.&nbsp; People don't LOVE Microsoft and Windows the way they might LOVE twitter, Digg, Macs, a sports team, other-community-building-group. The enthusiasm just isn't there. <br /><br />But alas, if I am selected to host a Windows 7 House Party - I assure you it will be rocking.&nbsp; So <b>if you live in SW London, please keep October 22 - October 29 free, it's gonna be a Windows 7 blast!</b><br /></div>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>The Importance of Internal Linking Structure</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.baseone.co.uk/blog/search/2009/09/importance-of-internal-linking-structure.html" />
    <id>tag:www.baseonegroup.co.uk,2009:/blog/search//2.200</id>

    <published>2009-09-11T13:16:17Z</published>
    <updated>2009-09-28T10:09:50Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[Having gone through a series of SEO evaluations those last few weeks, I was shocked to come across so many cases of websites with bad internal linking structure.&nbsp;&nbsp; I now think it's essential to stress on good internal linking since...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Joseph Volcy</name>
        <uri>http://www.baseonegroup.co.uk/beyond/joseph-volcy.html</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.baseone.co.uk/blog/search/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Having gone through a series of SEO evaluations those last few weeks, I was
shocked to come across so many cases of websites with bad internal linking
structure.&nbsp;&nbsp; I now think it's essential
to stress on good internal linking since I have the impression that web
designers often overlook the importance of having a well structured site in
terms of internal linking.&nbsp; The current
situation is very sad since a lot of websites are not benefitting of the power
of internal linking.&nbsp; I therefore compiled
a short list of factors that one should consider while building the website
structure.</p><p></p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="Internal-Linking.jpg" src="http://www.baseonesearch.co.uk/blog/Internal-Linking.jpg" width="372" height="273" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></span><p></p><p><b>Good Navigation</b> -&nbsp;The most important issue here is to make sure that the site navigation is
correctly spidered by the search engines.&nbsp;
We can ensure this by either use of anchor text and text based
navigation, or an image-based navigation type with significant 'alt attributes'
attached to every image link in the navigation.&nbsp;
Avoid Javascript and Flash navigations because they are still not well
crawlable and spidered by the search engines.&nbsp;
If you still want to keep your 'flashy' navigation then I'll suggest you
include an alternative navigation that would be spidered by major search
engines. For example, you could have a text based navigation at the bottom of
your page, this will help you inner pages be more spiderable. &nbsp;</p><p><b>XML Sitemap</b> - I cannot stress enough on having a good XML sitemap on your
website.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>Sitemaps provide an overview of
the site at a single glance but at the same time they help search engines crawl
the website.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>Submitting a XML sitemap to
Google Webmaster Tool for example can be very useful since it gives the search
engines a concise format that provides spiders with a super-fast blueprint for
indexing a website. Furthermore, sitemaps also improve web usability as they
are an alternative form of a site specific search, which brings users to the
information they need quicker. &nbsp;</p><p><span style="mso-spacerun:yes"><b>Breadcrumbs</b> - I believe breadcrumbs are excellent internal linking tools. Being
'links' by nature, they aid with internal linking and consequently increase the
search engine visibility. In addition to anchor text differentiation,
breadcrumbs are very useful since they increase the general </span><a href="http://www.useit.com/alertbox/breadcrumbs.html"><b>usability of the
website</b></a><b> </b><span style="mso-spacerun:yes">by allowing users to know exactly where they are on the website. &nbsp;</span></p><p><span style="mso-spacerun:yes"><b>Links in Content</b> - I had the chance to analyse different kind of websites in different
industries but it was quite common to see a lack of links in their copy.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>It's essential to have in-content links,
since not only they are more likely to have higher click through rates (increased
confidence path), but they are also capable to add more significance to a link
because of the neighbouring text.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>Therefore,
the rule of thumb here is to have links with anchor text with targeted keywords
in the copy of the website. &nbsp;</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><b>Links to Important Pages</b> - It's essential to always ensure that all important pages are
well linked to other pages on the website.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp;
</span>I sometimes found it amazing how some of the most important pages of a
website are not properly linked to other pages.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp;
</span>It is better to link them directly to the homepage so that they can benefit
from the power of link juice passing from the homepage.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>But time and again I see websites with
important pages buried too deep and ending up with no page-rank at all.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>And it's not uncommon to find those pages not
indexed by the search engines. &nbsp;</p><p class="MsoNormal"><b>Cross-check Robot.txt</b> - This may look stupid, but I came across cases where I found
important pages of a website not being crawled and spidered because they were
found in a section where the robot.txt was preventing spiders to crawl.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>This mainly happen by mistake or when new
pages are added to the website.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp;
</span>Sometimes webmasters tend to forget to go back to their robot.txt and
check whether all crawlable/non-crawlable sections are up-to-date.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>In brief, your important pages need to be findable,
if not there's no way they'll get crawled and indexed. &nbsp;</p><p class="MsoNormal"><b>Linking Policy</b> - It is very important to be extremely consistent in your linking
behaviour. What I mean is that while linking pages we need to be meticulous
about how we are building the links.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>I
once had to re-build the links of a whole website since links to the homepage
were very inconsistent.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>Some links were
pointing to the .com page whereas others were pointing to the .com/index.php page.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>The website also had some major
canonicalisation issues where several links were pointing to identical pages
but with different URLs.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>Cases like this
actually decrease all the power of internal linking since the link juice is
diluted around the site instead of being intelligently focused on the essential
pages.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>In brief a link policy should be
setup so that everyone building links knows exactly how and where to link them.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp;&nbsp;</span></p><p class="MsoNormal">Just to remind, good internal
linking ensures that all pages on your website get properly spidered
and indexed on search engines. &nbsp;It increases the relevancy of a page to the targeted keyword
phrase. &nbsp;Allows proper link juice passing to internal pages hence
increasing their page-rank.&nbsp;That's it, hope that this helps tuning and enhancing your internal link structure.&nbsp;<span>&nbsp;</span></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>A lesson from an unexpected source</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.baseone.co.uk/blog/search/2009/08/a-lesson-from-an-unexpected-so.html" />
    <id>tag:www.baseonegroup.co.uk,2009:/blog/search//2.199</id>

    <published>2009-08-26T17:17:56Z</published>
    <updated>2009-10-01T09:33:37Z</updated>

    <summary>Earlier this month, Seth Godin wrote a blog post entitled &apos;Lessons from very tiny businesses&apos;. This piece outlined 5 different things we can learn from small businesses, using examples of companies he has encountered. His second point was &apos;Be micro...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Gifford Morley-Fletcher</name>
        <uri>http://www.baseonegroup.co.uk/beyond/gifford-moreley-fletcher.html</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.baseone.co.uk/blog/search/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Earlier this month, Seth Godin wrote a blog post entitled <a href="http://bit.ly/fYCNA">'Lessons from very tiny businesses'</a>. This piece outlined 5 different things we can learn from small businesses, using examples of companies he has encountered.  His second point was 'Be micro focused and the search engines will find you'.  </p>

<p>Shortly after reading this, I was searching for a carpet cleaning service. I had used one earlier this year, but couldn't remember his number, so I went to his web site. Now bear in mind this is a one-man show, so what you would typically expect is at the most two pages - landing page and contact page. What you get is something else: 9 fully-optimised pages, a blog, and even a Twitter stream! </p>

<p>The thing that impressed me most, however, was the blog, 'My carpet cleaning blog'. Since November 2008, Chris (the carpet cleaner) has been diligently writing up many of his daily jobs as blog posts. Each one is titled with a variation on the phrases 'Carpet cleaning' or 'carpet cleaner', plus the location of the job, either as a postcode (W4, <span class="caps">W14</span>) or as the name of the location (Fulham, Wandsworth), and includes some detail on the job in question. In this way he is targeting relevant searches for carpet cleaning all over Greater London. Oh, and he follows these posts up with Tweets as well.</p>

<p>But that's not all. When he came to clean my carpets, Chris also explained how he has managed to get himself placed in Google Local Business ads for not one, but four different postcodes! By asking customers to write reviews, he is managing to come top of the list as well.</p>

<p>Ok, so not everything is rosy with his site from an <span class="caps">SEO </span>point of view. <span class="caps">URL</span>s need optimising, his blog is one of those 'wysiwyg' ones, and he has literally no incoming links at all. Still, with little technical background and knowledge, Chris has realised the importance of Google as a targeted traffic generator, learnt some of the basic rules of <span class="caps">SEO, </span>and applied them assiduously, and with great effect to one set of keyword combinations. Since last November, the site has been appearing on the front page of Google for many local London search related to carpet cleaning, and the number of contacts from his web site has literally doubled!</p>

<p>What's the lesson for me in all this? It's just as Mr Godin says - or as I interpret it anyway: sometimes, as we work on <span class="caps">SEO </span>for large organisations in highly competitive markets, we spread ourselves too wide, and look to achieve too much, making it far more difficult to deliver tangible results. Instead we need to identify where we can make a difference, and we need to focus on it. If an inexperienced one man band can do it, we have no excuses.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Organic SERPs showing Breadcrumbs</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.baseone.co.uk/blog/search/2009/08/organic-serps-showing-breadcru.html" />
    <id>tag:www.baseonegroup.co.uk,2009:/blog/search//2.198</id>

    <published>2009-08-25T15:32:21Z</published>
    <updated>2009-10-01T09:28:43Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[Looks like Google is trying out some new ways of displaying SERP URLs.&nbsp; In this image (taken by @robhammond), Google is sharing the location of a results page within a site by including the page's breadcrumb string instead of just...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Chelsea Blacker</name>
        <uri>http://www.baseonegroup.co.uk/beyond/chelsea-blacker.html</uri>
    </author>
    <category term="serp" label="SERP" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="serps" label="SERPs" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="breadcrumbs" label="breadcrumbs" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="organic" label="organic" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.baseone.co.uk/blog/search/">
        <![CDATA[Looks like Google is trying out some new ways of displaying SERP URLs.&nbsp; In this image (taken by @<a href="http://twitter.com/robhammond">robhammond</a>), Google is sharing the location of a results page within a site by including the page's breadcrumb string instead of just using the first 51 URL characters.<br /><br /><br /><br /><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="DISPLAY: inline"><img class="mt-image-center" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0pt auto 20px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" height="275" alt="google-results-breadcrumbs.png" src="http://www.baseonesearch.co.uk/blog/google-results-breadcrumbs.png" width="502" /></span><br />The Renault UK results page (#7) has matching breadcrumbs on the destination page:<br /><br /><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="DISPLAY: inline"><img class="mt-image-none" height="81" alt="breadcrumb_heaven.jpg" src="http://www.baseonesearch.co.uk/blog/breadcrumb_heaven.jpg" width="301" /></span><br /><br />Today, a search for mobility provides the same results with "normal" URLs: <br /><br /><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="DISPLAY: inline"><img class="mt-image-center" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0pt auto 20px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" height="292" alt="motablity.jpg" src="http://www.baseonesearch.co.uk/blog/motablity.jpg" width="521" /></span>So what does this mean?&nbsp; Should we all style out our sites with Hansel and Gretel in mind?&nbsp; Keeping Google's usability priorities in mind, I think bread crumbs should be a mainstay in any site anyways.&nbsp; Also, I do believe this is a feasible full time change we may see some time in the future.&nbsp; <br /><br />Displaying breadcrumbs in SERPs clearly maps out for searchers what section of the site their query result is located within; this will enable searchers to better read those URLs and have a clearer idea of whether or not that result is appropriate for their query. Also, if this is a going to be a major SERPs change, it's important the breadcrumbs don't go too deep since as always, there is limited character space. <br /><br />I'm looking forward to seeing how this alteration plays out - if you see any more examples shoot them to me <a href="http://twitter.com/chelseablacker">@ChelseaBlacker </a>or chelsea.blacker@baseonegroup.co.uk . <br />]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>AdWords Display URLs</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.baseone.co.uk/blog/search/2009/08/adwords-display-urls.html" />
    <id>tag:www.baseonegroup.co.uk,2009:/blog/search//2.197</id>

    <published>2009-08-25T14:31:07Z</published>
    <updated>2009-09-28T10:09:49Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[Regarding display URLs in AdWords ads, Google states that the domain must be identical to the destination URL's domain.&nbsp; But besides this rule, advertisers are free to incorporate keywords at the end of the display domain to be read as...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Chelsea Blacker</name>
        <uri>http://www.baseonegroup.co.uk/beyond/chelsea-blacker.html</uri>
    </author>
    <category term="adwordssubdomains" label="adwords subdomains" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="optimise" label="optimise" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="ppc" label="ppc" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.baseone.co.uk/blog/search/">
        <![CDATA[Regarding display URLs in AdWords ads, Google states that the domain must be identical to the destination URL's domain.&nbsp; But besides this rule, advertisers are free to incorporate keywords at the end of the display domain to be read as subfolders.&nbsp; An example is this ad, which bolds the term for my query "sony laptop" at the end of the display URL:<br /><br /><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="subfolder.jpg" src="http://www.baseonesearch.co.uk/blog/subfolder.jpg" class="mt-image-center" style="margin: 0pt auto 20px; text-align: center; display: block;" height="79" width="243" /></span><br />The question begs to be asked, if we can add keywords to the end of a display URL why not incorporate those keywords before the domain via display URL subdomains?&nbsp; Just to clarify, a subdomain is a domain that is part of a larger root domain, they read like this in a URL:<br /><br /><div align="center">http://subdomain.rootdomain.co.uk&nbsp;&nbsp; <br /></div><br />To my surprise, not many advertisers are <b>utilising keywords in display URL subdomains</b>.&nbsp; It's a great opportunity to include an ad group's targeted term at the front of the display URL, so users read those relevant bolded keywords first.&nbsp; Take advantage of it!&nbsp; <br /><div align="center"><br /></div><br /><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="ppc_ripoff.jpg" src="http://www.baseonesearch.co.uk/blog/ppc_ripoff.jpg" class="mt-image-center" style="margin: 0pt auto 20px; text-align: center; display: block;" height="82" width="220" /></span>The ad above with the subdomain "nokia-mobile-phones"&nbsp; goes to the page "www.top10co.uk" which clearly doesn't include such a subdomain:<br /><br /><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="ripoff_urls.jpg" src="http://www.baseonesearch.co.uk/blog/ripoff_urls.jpg" class="mt-image-center" style="margin: 0pt auto 20px; text-align: center; display: block;" height="199" width="519" /></span><br /><br />Google's<a href="http://adwords.blogspot.com/2008/02/update-to-display-url-policy.html"> AdWords help section</a>
confirms that <b>this is a legal technique</b> which is acceptable by AdWords.&nbsp;
However, when I phoned our Irish friends, the Adwords representative I
spoke with told me this was not permitted - it's such a rarely
used technique that even the Adwords rep's don't know about it!<br /><br />So be sure to utilise this technique in your AdWords ads.&nbsp; Also, remember that you can <b>delete the "www." in display URLs</b> which means 4 more characters for optimising your display URL. Now go... re-optimise those ads!]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Tracking TWITTER using GOOGLE ANALYTICS</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.baseone.co.uk/blog/search/2009/06/tracking-twitter.html" />
    <id>tag:www.baseonegroup.co.uk,2009:/blog/search//2.196</id>

    <published>2009-06-08T11:12:41Z</published>
    <updated>2009-09-28T10:09:49Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[At first I found it amazing how plenty of twitter applications are flooding over the web everyday, but looking at this phenomenon closer may be it's not so surprising.&nbsp; According to ComScore there has been an increase of Twitter traffic...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Joseph Volcy</name>
        <uri>http://www.baseonegroup.co.uk/beyond/joseph-volcy.html</uri>
    </author>
    <category term="webanalytics" label="Web Analytics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.baseone.co.uk/blog/search/">
        <![CDATA[<font style="font-size: 1.25em;">At first I found it amazing how plenty of twitter applications are flooding over the web everyday, but looking at this phenomenon closer may be it's not so surprising.&nbsp; According to <b><a href="http://www.comscore.com/">ComScore</a></b> there has been <b>an increase of Twitter traffic of up to 700 percent since last year</b> and number of twitter users are growing everyday. Therefore it's not surprising to see so many twitter tools emerging everyday, and sometimes it can be difficult to find yourself in this </font><font style="font-size: 1.25em;">tsunami of </font><font style="font-size: 1.25em;">twitter applications.&nbsp; <br /><br /></font><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="no-drowning.jpg" src="http://www.baseonesearch.co.uk/blog/no-drowning.jpg" class="mt-image-center" style="margin: 0pt auto 20px; text-align: center; display: block;" width="415" height="270" /></span><br /><font style="font-size: 1.25em;"> I was mostly concerned about tools on tracking twitter traffic. &nbsp;</font><font style="font-size: 1.25em;">For sure, there are a lot of 'cool' tools out there allowing us to track <b>number of hits</b>, <b>geolocalisation</b> and even do <b>real-time traffic analysis</b> but it was not always convenient to have data separated from my main web analytics software.&nbsp; My approach to web analytics is to have a consistent, reliable and integrated view of the traffic thus ensuring a clear vision on what is going on in my campaigns.&nbsp; Furthermore, after testing several twitter analytics applications I didn't find the statistics from the different tools meaningful enough.&nbsp; So I revert back tracking my tweets on <b>Google Analytics</b> (GA).&nbsp; It is much more powerful in my opinion when&nbsp; considering all the functions that we have on GA.&nbsp; It would be wiser to use them to track our twitter campaigns.&nbsp; For example, we can track and analyse goals and <b><a href="http://www.baseonesearch.co.uk/blog/2008/07/the-conversion-dating-rules.html">conversion rates</a> </b>knowing very well how conversion rate analysis is imperative today.<br /><br />Google analytics by default shows traffic coming from twitter but wait.. it shows traffic coming from Twitter.com only and today most of the people using Twitter never even visit twitter.com! For that reason, I prefer to manually add some utm codes on my URLs and this allows me to track my tweets wherever they are, even if someone forward my tweets by email. <br /><br />As you know, tweets that include a URL use some type of URL shortening service, like <b><a href="http://bit.ly/">http://bit.ly</a></b> or <b><a href="http://cli.gs/">http://cli.gs</a></b>, but we will be using the classic <b><a href="http://tinyurl.com/">Tinyurl.com</a> </b>which shortens a URL by creating a redirect that is hosted on <a href="http://tinyurl.com/">www.tinyurl.com</a>.&nbsp; The trick is to add GA's campaign tracking parameters to our Tiny URL, thus encoding campaign info into the URL we use in our tweets:<br /><br /><b>?utm_campaign=blogpost&amp;utm_source=twitter&amp;utm_medium=micro-blog</b><br /><br />Of course you can change the utm_campaign and utm_medium names to anything you like but be sure they makes sense since you will be using them in your analyses later.<br /><br />Example: <br /><b>http://www.itjoblog.co.uk/?utm_campaign=itjoblogpost&amp;utm_source=twitter&amp;utm_medium=micro-blog </b><br /><br />After adding this code to the URL, we shorten it using TinyURL and finally use the 'shortened' URL in our tweets which will be traceable by GA. <br /><br />Below is a picture on how the data appear in '<b>All Traffic Sources</b>' report in GA:<br /><br /></font><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="Twitter_Web_Analytics.jpg" src="http://www.baseonesearch.co.uk/blog/Twitter_Web_Analytics.jpg" class="mt-image-center" style="margin: 0pt auto 20px; text-align: center; display: block;" width="489" height="154" /></span><br /><font style="font-size: 1.25em;"> This is very cool, but it's even nicer to use all the power of Google Analytics in your web analyses, for example you could use <a href="http://www.baseonesearch.co.uk/blog/2009/03/why-you-should-segment-your-vi.html"><b>Advanced Segments</b></a> feature to subdivide your visitors based on operating systems they used to reach your tweets <i><b>(Windows, Mac, Iphone, etc)</b></i>. Or if you like you could create your own segment that makes sense to your campaign.<br />&nbsp;<br />As said by Gail Ennis, senior vice-president of marketing at Omniture: <i><b>"Online marketers recognise the importance of brand reputation management in the social media environment,"</b></i> and I believe that accurate twitter tracking is fundamental and can help a lot in social media campaign analysis.</font><br /><div><br /></div><div><br /></div>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>New Kid in the School of Digg</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.baseone.co.uk/blog/search/2009/04/learning-digg-the-school-for-g.html" />
    <id>tag:www.baseonegroup.co.uk,2009:/blog/search//2.195</id>

    <published>2009-04-22T15:30:38Z</published>
    <updated>2009-09-28T10:09:49Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[I've been playing around with a Digg account lately, trying to figure out how to best incorporate our clients content into this fun social networking site.&nbsp; Digg is unique because it doesn't 1.An Ace Nickname: The Username.&nbsp; I'm a big...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Chelsea Blacker</name>
        <uri>http://www.baseonegroup.co.uk/beyond/chelsea-blacker.html</uri>
    </author>
    <category term="digg" label="digg" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="smo" label="smo" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="socialmedia" label="social media" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.baseone.co.uk/blog/search/">
        <![CDATA[I've been playing around with a Digg account lately, trying to figure out how to best incorporate our clients content into this fun social networking site.&nbsp; Digg is unique because it doesn't <br /><br />1.<b>An Ace Nickname: The Username</b>.&nbsp; I'm a big fan of creating plausible usernames - in this case I used my real name.&nbsp; As a newbie, using a normal name like "Scott Osman" or "Miranda Mocco" helps sets the precedent that you're not a bot out to spam.<br /><br />2.<b>It's all About Looks: Your Avatar</b>.&nbsp; This needs to be unique from other users and if possible, consistent across social networking sites.&nbsp; I threw a relatively ugly yellow border around my image, as an easy way for people to indicate it's me.&nbsp; Check out some successful avatars and get a little feedback on what people think of yours. http://avatarwall.com/toprated.&nbsp; Again, I found that as a newbie, people like seeing a face, it makes communicating more friendly, but as always different people like different things.<br /><br />3.<b>Hang Out in the Cool Places: Share Your Profiles!&nbsp;</b> Digg permits members to share tons of profile links, be sure to take advantage of this so your future friends can easily contact you.&nbsp; Be sure to include your: Twitter, AIM, MSN, Yahoo!, Gchat, last.fm, facebook, linked in, reddit, and stumble upon profiles.&nbsp; <br /><br />4.<b>Make friends with the popular crowd</b>.&nbsp; Long ago Digg had a top users list (sometimes referred to as the "holy grail"), but it was deleted.&nbsp; I used an alternative list set up by SocialBlade to friend <a href="http://socialblade.com/digg/diggfpdata.php">top active diggers</a>. <br />By friending them, you will become their "fan" whereby you receive updates on their Digg activities; it is only when they accept you as a friend that your status is certified as "mutual friends" and your activity will be received by them.<br /><br />5.<b>Identify stylish trends: Pin Pointing Submissions with Front Page Potential</b>.&nbsp; How do you find the high potential articles when the majority of submissions are spam with one or two Diggs?&nbsp; First and foremost, digg your friends submissions as they appear, especially if the friend sends a "shout" (like a facebook wall post) promoting a certain submission.&nbsp; You're allowed 200 diggs a day - depending on how much of a life you have, try to use all 200. <br />I'm a huge fan of the <a href="http://www.thegooglecache.com/digg-noise-filter.php">Digg Noise Filter</a>, which pulls up articles with your requested number of diggs in it.&nbsp; Or try the Flash based <a href="http://garycarstensen.googlepages.com/diggwatcher.html">Digg Watcher</a>. <br /><br />6. <b>Back Stabbing:</b> <b>Talk about your Friends</b>.&nbsp; I cannot stress this one enough.&nbsp; You <b><i>must</i></b> <b>comment on submissions</b>, and the more people who vote up your comment, the more recognition you get. &nbsp;<br /><br />I've certainly struggled to figure out what makes a popular comment; supporting Obama, comic book heroes, and protests all seem to be green lights.&nbsp; Whitty banter, sarcasm, and jokes are usually popular, and comments like "interesting submission" often get a thumbs down for being too obvious.&nbsp; <br />Being one of the first people to comment on an article that goes to the front page is a great way to build up your recognition.&nbsp; People who view the article will see your comment as it appears at the top of the page, hence more are likely to vote it a thumbs up, and hopefully friend you. &nbsp;<br />Check out where your popular friends are commenting and be sure to "reply" to their comments.&nbsp; This will call attention to yourself and hopefully be enough to convince them to friend you back. <br /><br />Spend about 1 month following the above rules.&nbsp; In part II (which will also take me about 1 month to write!) I'll go over great strategies for submitting content that gets notable traffic.&nbsp; In the mean time, get commenting!<br /><br />]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>WHY YOU SHOULD SEGMENT YOUR VISITORS? (Google Analytics)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.baseone.co.uk/blog/search/2009/03/why-you-should-segment-your-vi.html" />
    <id>tag:www.baseonegroup.co.uk,2009:/blog/search//2.194</id>

    <published>2009-03-23T16:19:18Z</published>
    <updated>2009-09-28T10:09:49Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[Some time ago Avinash Kaushik the web analytics Guru said: "Analyzing data in aggregate is a crime against humanity". No we're not talking about the last episode of Dexter but about the visitors to your website.&nbsp; Segmentation has become one...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Joseph Volcy</name>
        <uri>http://www.baseonegroup.co.uk/beyond/joseph-volcy.html</uri>
    </author>
    <category term="googleanalytics" label="Google Analytics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="visitorsegmentation" label="Visitor Segmentation" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="webanalytics" label="Web Analytics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.baseone.co.uk/blog/search/">
        <![CDATA[<font style="font-size: 1.25em;">Some time ago <a href="http://www.kaushik.net/avinash/">Avinash Kaushik</a> the web analytics Guru said: <i><b>"Analyzing data in aggregate is a crime against humanity"</b></i>. No we're not talking about the last episode of Dexter but about the visitors to your website.&nbsp; Segmentation has become one of the most important thing you should do to understand traffic to your website and hence your business.</font><br /><br /><br /><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="Visitor Segmentation - Google Analytics.jpg" src="http://www.baseonesearch.co.uk/blog/Visitor%20Segmentation%20-%20Google%20Analytics.jpg" class="mt-image-center" style="margin: 0pt auto 20px; text-align: center; display: block;" width="333" height="500" /></span><font style="font-size: 1.25em;">So why is visitor segmentation so important?<br /><br />It is simply the breaking of your site visitors into groups and examining traffic and conversion data for those specific groups.&nbsp; Actually, in Google Analytics, you can perform advanced visitor segmentation and see the number of visits, the average number of pages viewed per visit, and conversion rates for different groups of visitors (example analysis of visitors from different locations).<br /><br />Google Analytics provides a number of default segments like New, Returning, Paid and Non-Paid Visitors, Search, Direct and Referral Traffic.&nbsp; But you can also create your own custom segments. For example you could find yourself <i><b>segmenting branded search vs non-branded search terms for organic and paid traffic.</b></i>&nbsp; Why segmenting all these? Because looking at 'all' your figures that in average does not mean a lot. Figures like 'Average Time on Site' does not mean a lot since it is too broad. To find the real actionable insights we need to break our analytics data and split the various sources, behaviour, goals and outcomes.&nbsp; In brief we need to focus on the details as far as possible.&nbsp; Because trying to make strategic decision based on global data can simply lead our business to failure.<br /><br /></font><div align="center"><font style="font-size: 1.25em;"><b>Google Analytics Advanced Segments</b></font> <br /></div><br /><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="visitor-segmentation-google-analytics.jpg" src="http://www.baseonesearch.co.uk/blog/visitor-segmentation-google-analytics.jpg" class="mt-image-center" style="margin: 0pt auto 20px; text-align: center; display: block;" width="525" height="395" /></span><font style="font-size: 1.25em;">Ok, let's now really ask why we should segment our visitors and customers and think about the 'real' reasons for these.<br /><br />In today's, highly competitive world successful companies realise that the nurturing of high-value, faithful, recurring, pleased and lucrative customers is the key solution for having long lasting profits and help the business stay afloat.&nbsp; In fact, I totally believe that it is imperative for organisations to properly identify their customers. No company can afford to offer the premier level of service to all its customers without really knowing who they are.&nbsp; <br /><br />Therefore calculating the visitors' and customers' value to the company enable us to know better the different types of customers we have and therefore put us in a better position to allocate valuable resources to different types of visitors/customers.&nbsp;&nbsp; After discovery of those different customer classes we can approach different type of customers differently, like proposing appropriate products at appropriate prices for a particular segment. <br /><br />For exemple: <b>Advanced segmentation</b> <b>could let you see what are the web pages that are most visited by visitors who came on your site by typing brand keywords.</b> And also what are the products that they bought?<br /><br />Another common term '<b>Customer Differentiation</b>' is in fact the segmentation of the high-value and high-potential customers but also the identification and separation of the least cost-effective customers. This process is important to know who the company want to serve, it involves the effort to understand what the customer really wants, what are the customers worth or potential.&nbsp; After discovering valuable information about customers we are is in a better position to give priority to the most profitable ones. We can also decide what to do with the least cost-effective customers. <br /><br />For exemple: It is useful to discover who are the customers that purchased more than one items on your website, and/or who are the ones that purchased again.&nbsp; Then based on these figures we could deploy more effort to a particular 'segment' of our customers.<br /><br />One way of <b>differentiating customers</b> <b>is by establishing a baseline for the servicing cost of all customers</b>.&nbsp; The segmentation of all customers should then be done to represent them in figures. After that we evaluate actual and <b>strategic value of all the different types of customers</b> <i>(segments)</i> and finally compare the customer value figures to the baseline established before and consequently make appropriate strategic decisions accordingly.&nbsp; The following graph shows an example of how customer segmentation, customer value and the servicing cost baseline can be represented for decision-making purposes.<br /><br /></font><div align="center"><font style="font-size: 1.25em;"><b>Customer Differentiation</b></font><br /><br /></div><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="Visitor-differentiation-graph.jpg" src="http://www.baseonesearch.co.uk/blog/Visitor-differentiation-graph.jpg" class="mt-image-center" style="margin: 0pt auto 20px; text-align: center; display: block;" width="459" height="358" /></span><font style="font-size: 1.25em;">Customers in the 'Tier 1' are actually the most valued customers with the highest actual and strategic value, they can be considered as the company's very important customers (VIP) and all effort must be made not to lose them.<br /><br />Whereas the last group (tier 5) is well below the customer service cost baseline and has also a very low strategic value, appropriate decisions can then be made by managers concerning those customers classified under this group.&nbsp; For example: <i>keep them with expectations that they can be more lucrative later or simply fire them?<br /></i><br />As said by <a href="http://www.stonetemple.com/articles/interview-brett-crosby-103108.shtml">Brett Crosby</a>,&nbsp; the Manager of&nbsp; Google Analytics : <b><i>"Segmentation can help you perform better through an economic downturn and go with what works, find new ways to drive revenue, find the right segments, working for them and invest there to increase their conversions."</i></b></font><br /><br /><br /> <div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>About the Latest Google Update (aka &quot;Vince update&quot;) - as well as a Brief History of some of the Google Updates</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.baseone.co.uk/blog/search/2009/03/about-the-latest-google-update-the-vince-update.html" />
    <id>tag:www.baseonegroup.co.uk,2009:/blog/search//2.193</id>

    <published>2009-03-18T14:55:42Z</published>
    <updated>2009-10-01T09:29:44Z</updated>

    <summary>Mid February this year people in the search industry spotted a change in how Google returned search results for certain types of keywords, a change giving &quot;big brands&quot; a push in Google search results. Following discussions on blogs and forums...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mathias Ahlgren</name>
        
    </author>
    <category term="brandoptimisation" label="brand optimisation" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="floridaupdate" label="florida update" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="google" label="google" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="relnofollowtag" label="rel nofollow tag" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="searchengineoptimisation" label="search engine optimisation" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="seo" label="seo" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="universalsearch" label="universal search" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="vinceupdate" label="vince update" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.baseone.co.uk/blog/search/">
        <![CDATA[<font style="FONT-SIZE: 1.56em"><b></b></font><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="DISPLAY: inline"><img class="mt-image-right" style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0pt 0pt 20px 20px" height="200" alt="vince.jpg" src="http://www.baseonesearch.co.uk/blog/vince.jpg" width="200" /></span><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1.25em">Mid February this year people in the search industry spotted a <b>change in how Google returned search results</b> for certain types of keywords, a change giving <b>"big brands" a push</b> in Google search results. Following discussions on blogs and forums <a href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog"><b>Matt Cutts</b></a> (head of <b>Google's Webspam team</b>), on March 4th finally confirmed a change had been made. The update was dubbed the "<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LMfWPWUh5uU"><b>Vince update</b></a>" (no sorry, not a Vince Neil update)<br /><br />More on the "Vince update" later on and now a brief history of important updates of Google's search algorithm.<br /><br /><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1.25em"><b>The "Florida Update"</b></font><br /><br />On November 16th 2003 Google made a major update on their search algorithm. Named the "<b>Florida update</b>", it had a major effect for a very large number of websites at the time and came to change the course of search engine optimisation.<br /><br />Aaron Wall from <a href="http://www.seobook.com/"><b>SEObook</b></a> says: "<i>The Google Florida update was the first update that made SEO complicated enough to where most people could not figure out how to do it. Before that update all you needed to do was buy and/or trade links with your target keyword in the link anchor text, and after enough repetition you stood a good chance of ranking</i>."<br /><br />Pre-Florida update prominent search engine ranking could be quite easily achieved by doing basic <b>reciprocal link-building</b>, <b>on-page keyword stuffing</b>, and using <b>repetitive inbound anchor text</b> in links.<br /><br />Post-Florida update a huge number of pages, many of which had ranked at or near the top of the results for a very long time, simply disappeared from the search engine results altogether.<br /><br /><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1.25em"><b>The "rel=nofollow tag Update"</b></font><br /><br />In January 2005 Google contributed to changing the structure of the Internet when Google proposed a link <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2005/01/preventing-comment-spam.html"><b>rel=nofollow tag</b></a>. Originally it was introduced to only <b>stop blog spamming</b> but was shortly afterwards also affecting <b>link buying</b>. In the eyes of Google you are considered a spammer, and risk getting penalised, if you were buying links without using rel=nofollow on them.<br /><br />In a URL the tag looks like this: &lt;a href="http://www.baseonesearch.co.uk" rel="nofollow"&gt;Base One Search&lt;/a&gt;<br /><br />Plenty of prominent websites have adopted the use of the nofollow tag, sites such as <b>Wikipedia</b>, <b>Facebook</b>, <b>Flickr</b>, <b>YouTube </b>and most <b>blog platforms </b>support the tag in the comments section.<br /><br />"<i>By adding rel="nofollow" to a hyperlink, a page indicates that the destination of that hyperlink SHOULD NOT be afforded any additional weight or ranking by user agents which perform link analysis upon web pages (e.g. search engines).</i>" (<a href="http://microformats.org/wiki/rel-nofollow">http://microformats.org/wiki/rel-nofollow</a>)<br /><br /><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1.25em"><b>The "Universal Search Update"</b></font><br /><br />In May 2007 Google launched their <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2007/05/universal-search-best-answer-is-still.html"><b>Universal search</b></a> update. Universal search means that <b>search engine results are blended with selected content</b> from Google's "vertical search databases". The vertical search content is blended directly into the organic search results. Before the "Universal search" update Google gave a list of 10 text-based search engine results.<br /><br />The "vertical search databases" Google blend into the organic search engine results are: <b>News</b>,<b> </b><b>Videos</b></font><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1.25em">,</font><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1.25em"> <b>Products</b></font><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1.25em">,</font><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1.25em"><b> </b><b>Maps</b></font><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1.25em">,</font><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1.25em"><b> </b><b>Images</b></font><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1.25em">,</font><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1.25em"><b> </b><b>Books </b>&amp; <b>Blog posts</b><br /><br />Today optimising your website for Universal search is important, (e.g. by adding <b>alt-tags</b> and <b>keywords </b>to your <b>images</b>, listing your business of Google <b>Maps</b>, creating <b>videos </b>and optimising <b>title</b>, <b>description</b>, <b>tags </b>etc.), you can increase your chances of achieving prominent search engine rankings.<br /><br /><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1.25em"><b>The "Vince Update</b>"</font><br /><br />In October 2008 <b>CEO of Google Eric Schmidt</b> gave a hint of things to come, i.e. the "Vince update". In an interview he talked about "brands", he said:<br /><br />"<i>The internet is fast becoming a "cesspool" where false information thrives, Google CEO Eric Schmidt said yesterday. Speaking with an audience of magazine executives visiting the Google campus here as part of their annual industry conference, he said their brands were increasingly important signals that content can be trusted</i>." He continued: "<i>Brands are the solution, not the problem," Mr. Schmidt said. "Brands are how you sort out the cesspool.</i>" "<i>Brand affinity is clearly hard wired," he said. "It is so fundamental to human existence that it's not going away. It must have a genetic component.</i>" (<a href="http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=131569">http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=131569</a>)<br /><br />The "<b>Vince update</b>" has caused a bit of outcry in the search community because with the update it's believed (and proven) that <b>Google is now favouring brands/corporations for core category keywords</b>. Aaron Wall from <b>SEObook </b>in his <a href="http://www.seobook.com/google-branding">blog post</a> proved changes had been made in the search engine results, evidence big brands getting favoured. An example is in mid-January <b>three major US airlines</b> all of a sudden began getting top rankings for "<b>airline tickets</b>" (see below)<br />&nbsp;<br /></font><img class="mt-image-none" height="409" alt="rankpulse.jpg" src="http://www.baseonesearch.co.uk/blog/rankpulse.jpg" width="500" /><br /><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1.25em">(<a href="http://www.rankpulse.com/airline-tickets">http://www.rankpulse.com/airline-tickets</a>)<br /><br />Addressing it as a "<b>minor change</b>", <b>Matt Cutts</b> says the change is about <b>factoring trust more into the algorithm</b> for more generic queries rather than <b>pushing major brands</b> to top search engine results.<br /><br />So does this latest Google "update" - "minor change" mean that big brands/corporations can take a back seat and receive top search engine rankings in Google by default? I think not, the "Vince update" may well be just a minor change. Google is continually tuning its algorithms to give most relevant results for users.<br /><br />For navigational-type searches (aka research queries, "going through the front door in the shopping centre") such as cars, airline tickets etc. brand/corporation sites are maybe what searchers are looking for? In the above illustrated example, shouldn't there be a couple of airline companies in the results when you search for airline tickets?<br /><br /><br /></font>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>You Walk Into A Bar (Social Media Style..)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.baseone.co.uk/blog/search/2009/02/you-walk-into-a-bar-social-med.html" />
    <id>tag:www.baseonegroup.co.uk,2009:/blog/search//2.192</id>

    <published>2009-02-23T15:45:38Z</published>
    <updated>2009-09-28T10:09:48Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[I went to SES London last week, and during the Social Media Optimisation seminar Krista Neher, CEO of the marketing solutions company Marketess, told this cute social media parable.&nbsp; You walk into a bar and start talking to your friend.&nbsp;...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Chelsea Blacker</name>
        <uri>http://www.baseonegroup.co.uk/beyond/chelsea-blacker.html</uri>
    </author>
    <category term="smo" label="smo" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="socialmedia" label="social media" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.baseone.co.uk/blog/search/">
        <![CDATA[I went to SES London last week, and during the Social Media Optimisation seminar Krista Neher, CEO of the <a href="http://www.themarketess.com/">marketing solutions</a> company Marketess, told this cute social media parable.&nbsp; <br /><br />You walk into a bar and start talking to your friend.&nbsp; Suddenly, this jerk jumps in between you two and says "TRY MY NEW BEER! IT'S AMAZING!".&nbsp; You probably look at your friend with those "what the heck is this looser doing?" eyes and bee line for the door.&nbsp; <br /><br /><div align="center">This is what happens when companies try to advertise on social networking sites, they shove their product in user's faces and are shocked when no one responds positively.&nbsp; "But we did a social media campaign!" they clamber, all gobbly eyed.<br /><br /></div><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="seo_consulting.jpg" src="http://www.baseonesearch.co.uk/blog/seo_consulting.jpg" class="mt-image-center" style="margin: 0pt auto 20px; text-align: center; display: block;" width="300" height="225" /></span><div align="center">Don't ruin their night by screaming about your product.<br /></div><br />Rewind:&nbsp; You walk into a bar and start talking to your friend.&nbsp; When you need a new drink the cute bartender asks "Would you like to try this new beer?&nbsp; It's quite good."&nbsp; You probably look at your friend and say "sure, why not?" and viola!&nbsp; You've been introduced to a new product.&nbsp; This is how social media should work.<br />&nbsp;<br />The key in example #2 is it wasn't forced on you.&nbsp; Social media campaigns cannot work if the material is forced, the entire point is that users support the content because it's actually of interest to them.&nbsp; By offering a new beer when you were ready for a new drink, the beer company is providing a solution to your need when you (the consumer) wanted it.&nbsp; <br /><br /> <div><br /></div><div><br /></div>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

</feed>
